Showing posts with label Fish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fish. Show all posts

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Big Pecker Video

Posted by Kirk


Now that the post title has your attention let's talk woodpeckers. This male Pileated Woodpecker came to the feeders at lunch on last week. The sunshine has been beautiful and welcome. This same bird has been hitting the suet feeders pretty much every day in this cold weather. In my experience, the pileated woodpecker is the shiest of all the woodpeckers we have in Minnesota. I can stand at the window and watch downy, hairy and red-bellied woodpeckers as they feed and they don't seem to care about my presence. I've even seen Downy Woodpeckers eat out of people's hands. Pileated Woodpeckers, however, seem to fly away at the slightest detection of movement. I find this surprising as they are such a large bird. My natural instinct is to assume that larger birds need not be flighty as their size offers some protection in terms of predators. It could be though that larger animals present a larger more easily seen target. Little birds can blend in so well and hide that perhaps they need not be as flighty.

I decided to do a search of the literature and see if I could find anything. The first study I came across was this one titled, Does intruder group size and Orientation affect bird flight initiation distance in birds? (links to pdf) The answer is Yes. This study was on the size of the predator though so it doesn't answer my question.

This research suggest that at least in fish, the larger the animal the larger the Flight Initiation Distance. That's the technical term for how close you can get to an animal before it get's the heck out of Dodge. While I couldn't find anything on Pileated Woodpeckers I did find this interesting paper about downy woodpeckers. Vigilance and foraging substrate: anti-predatory considerations in a non-standard environment. This paper talks about the size of trees they use and behavior. It talks about how woodpeckers will continually peek around a tree to keep an eye on their surroundings. Pileated Woodpeckers do this in a seriously overly dramatic paranoid fashion.

The last study I found was Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. This one is great. I just had to include the entire abstract below.

When approached by humans, virtually all species flee, but we lack an understanding of the factors that influence flight response among species. Understanding this variation may allow us to understand how ‘fear’ structures communities, as well as to predict which species are likely to coexist with humans. I used flight initiation distance (FID) as a comparative metric of wariness and examined the relative importance of life history and natural history traits in explaining variation in FID in 150 species of birds. In a series of comparative analyses, I used independent contrasts to control for phylogenetic similarity and regressed continuous life history traits against flight initiation distance. Body size had a large and significant effect in explaining variation in flightiness: larger species initiated flight at greater distances than smaller species. After controlling for variation explained by body size, there was a nonsignificant positive relation between the age of first reproduction and FID. There were no relations between FID and clutch size, number of days spent feeding young, longevity, or habitat density. I used concentrated changes tests to look for evidence of coevolution between flightiness and dichotomous traits. Flightiness evolved multiple times and some clades were flightier than others. Flightiness was more likely to evolve in omnivorous/carnivorous species and in cooperatively breeding species. These results suggest that body size and age of first reproduction are important in explaining variation in disturbance tolerance in birds, and that species that capture live prey and those that are highly social are relatively wary. The results suggest a novel mechanism of how anthropogenic disturbance may contribute to extinction.

Did you catch the key sentence there? "Body size had a large and significant effect in explaining variation in flightiness: larger species initiated flight at greater distances than smaller species." Great, so the reason Pileated Woodpeckers are flightier than other woodpeckers is that they are bigger. Now then, why! Why is there a correlation between body size in birds and flightiness. Also why is it the exact opposite of what we see in fish?

~Kirk
Read More

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Cigarette Butts Kill Fish

Posted by Kirk
I'm worn out from a long day of fossil hunting but I thought this was worthy of passing on. For all those morons who think cigarette butts biodegrade, read on. Not only do they not biodegrade, it turns out they are really good at killing fish.



Why not help out the cause and support one of the coolest companies on Earth, Northern Sun. Your car can sport the following bumper sticker just like my co-worker Julie.Enough said.

~Kirk
Read More

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Are Those Fish Robots?

Posted by Kirk 4 Comments
Back when I used to work as an aquatic life interpreter at UnderWater World we would get some really stupid questions and hear some amazing things out of people's mouths. If you've never been there, the aquarium is several million gallons and in 4 sections representing different habitats. Back then they were called, Minnesota Lake, Mississippi River, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Reef. The idea was that you traveled south from a lake to the river to the gulf to the reef.
Creative Commons photo
by Rosie Argento
They changed this after I left mostly because they wanted to add new species of sharks into the large "gulf" tank and some of those species don't live in the gulf. Same for the reef, they wanted to add non-Caribbean species so the names changed.

Visitors move through the aquarium through a clear domed walkway and are surrounded by fish. We used to say it was like scuba diving without getting wet. The left side of the tunnel is a moving walkway while the right is non-moving in case you want to step off and watch the fish more. We once had a guy get about 3/4th of the way through before he had a sudden realization and said out loud, "Oh, I'm moving." No genius, you are standing still and we're rotating a 1.2 million gallon aquarium around you.

One of the questions we incredibly used to get all the time was, "Are these fish real?" Apparently a lot of people thought they were robots or something. I always thought it was a pretty stupid question but apparently researchers with Essex University are now working on robotic fish. The robots are like the roomba vacuum I have at home in that are autonomous. The idea is to equip them with sensors to detect pollution. The fish could swim around along pipelines looking for leaks. Let's just hope they are unlike my roomba in two important ways.

1) They don't break constantly and
2) They don't get stuck on pretty much anything in their way.



~Kirk
Read More